| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: query plan ignoring check constraints |
| Date: | 2005-06-21 01:41:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1894.24.211.165.134.1119318071.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus said:
> KL-
>
>> I still think the fact that that discussion is taking place on a
>> completely non-hackers mailing list is the lamest thing ever...
>
> What, like phpPgAdmin? ;-)
>
Josh,
That is not an appropriate analogy at all - range partitioning is an
inherently server-side feature, while phppgadmin is a client-side admin GUI.
Chris' point as I understand it is that server-side features should be
discussed on -hackers, and I have some sympathy with that POV.
And if you feel like mentioning plperlng in this context, I will tell you
that I wouldn't do it again that way in the light of experience, even though
it is arguably far more separable.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-06-21 02:05:04 | Re: query plan ignoring check constraints |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-06-21 01:09:48 | Re: query plan ignoring check constraints |