Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with
Date: 2003-08-28 20:45:59
Message-ID: 18930.1062103559@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> Hmmm I think there's still something missing here. I was using pg_restore -r
>> (actually I was using -L but the list was originally generated with -r) which
>> seemed like a good idea at the time. Rereading it now it seems like it
>> shouldn't change anything because it says "This option is the default":

Actually, your real problem is that the documentation of -r bears no
relationship whatever to what the code really does :-(

I have attempted to improve it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-28 20:49:14 Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-08-28 20:45:45 [cguttesen@yahoo.dk: Re: Some additional tests run on my performance testing]