Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-07-03 00:21:13
Message-ID: 18912.1215044473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> Well, yeah, but that seems a very long way off. In the meantime a lot
>> of people use the existing pgfoundry citext module.

> Indeed, but why isn't this code put there as well?

Well, actually, that might be the best thing to do with it. But it
would be sensible to give it a code review anyway, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-03 00:43:26 Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-07-03 00:00:11 Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands