| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 |
| Date: | 2001-03-30 06:15:15 |
| Message-ID: | 189.985932915@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> Just looked in heapam.c - I can fix it in two hours.
> The question is - should we do this now?
This scares the hell out of me.
I do NOT think we should be making quick-hack changes in fundamental
system semantics at this point of the release cycle.
The problem went unnoticed for two full release cycles --- therefore,
it can wait another cycle for a fix that has been considered, reviewed,
and tested. Let's not risk making things worse by releasing a new
behavior we might find out is also wrong.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-30 06:17:31 | Re: Unsigned int functions |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-03-30 06:14:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-30 06:22:21 | Re: [PATCHES] Error in the date field (with NULL value...).Thanks! |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-03-30 06:14:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 |