Re: Vacuum (table performance)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Claudio Lapidus" <clapidus(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum (table performance)
Date: 2003-06-25 22:43:07
Message-ID: 18898.1056580987@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Claudio Lapidus" <clapidus(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... we are seeing increasing execution times, not for the
> function but for the vacuum itself.

Does a REINDEX of the table fix it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Lapidus 2003-06-25 23:16:42 Re: Vacuum (table performance)
Previous Message Claudio Lapidus 2003-06-25 22:38:51 Vacuum (table performance)