Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg
Date: 2009-11-16 15:05:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:29, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:56:54AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> Yeah, sorry guys.  I fixed the CVS log message now.

>> So it's not only not strange, I'm very happy it didn't pull those
>> changes and broke my repository :-)

> Yeah, I'm glad it didn't do anything funny with the mirror.

I think we should have a policy of NO manual changes to the CVS
repository files.  At least not without careful discussion beforehand.
The lack of a commit message for this one small patch was absolutely
not worth taking any risks to fix.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-16 15:14:33
Subject: Re: What is the correct way to extract values from an int8 array in SPI?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-11-16 15:00:47
Subject: Re: ORDER BY vs. volatile functions

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-11-16 17:05:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-11-16 08:32:59
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: /home/peter/commit-msg

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group