Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach
Date: 2019-05-02 07:37:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(resending, previous attempt didn't make it to pgsql-hackers)

On 29/04/2019 16:16, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> In previous emails, I have sent two patches with test and bugfix (see
> attached).
> After Heikki shared his concerns, I've rechecked the algorithm and
> haven't found any potential error.
> So, if other hackers are agreed with my reasoning, the suggested fix is
> sufficient and can be committed.

I still believe there is a problem with grandparent splits with this.
I'll try to construct a test case later this week, unless you manage to
create one before that.

- Heikki

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-05-02 08:06:19 Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan?
Previous Message John Naylor 2019-05-02 07:09:26 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch