Re: Underscores in numeric literals

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Underscores in numeric literals
Date: 2023-02-02 22:39:59
Message-ID: 18865902-c612-9fdf-8222-6ce09d5a7b72@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31.01.23 17:09, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:28, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Did you have any thoughts about what to do with the float types? I
>> guess we could handle those in a separate patch?
>>
>
> I was assuming that we'd do nothing for float types, because anything
> we did would necessarily impact their performance.

Yeah, as long as we are using strtof() and strtod() we should just leave
it alone. If we have break that open and hand-code something, we can
reconsider it.

So I think you could go ahead with committing your patch and we can
consider this topic done for now.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-02-02 22:48:05 Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-02-02 22:39:19 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15