| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite! |
| Date: | 2003-06-25 22:40:21 |
| Message-ID: | 18859.1056580821@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
>> SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
>> although it was removed during 7.4 development. Could we have that
>> out of there in the next patch?
> Accoring to GUC.c this morning, the option is still there ... it's just been
> re-named to "LOG_BTREE_BUILD_STATS". Is this a mistake in GUC.c, or should
> I put it back in Runtime.SGML under the new name?
Ah, you are right. I had confused this with another option that I did
remove during 7.4 devel (fixbtree or something like that). Yeah, the
correct fix is to document it under Developer Options as
"LOG_BTREE_BUILD_STATS".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-25 23:00:08 | Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite! |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-25 22:31:44 | Re: Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite! |