From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "[Jos_] Soares" <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] having bug report |
Date: | 1999-11-30 02:15:22 |
Message-ID: | 18826.943928122@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Any comments on that status of this one?
Those particular cases are fixed, I think, but there are still severe
problems with VIEWs that use grouping or aggregates. I doubt we can
improve the VIEW situation much more without subselects-in-FROM.
regards, tom lane
>> * subqueries containing HAVING return incorrect results
>>
>> select istat from comuni where istat in (
>> select istat from comuni group by istat having count(istat) > 1
>> );
>> ERROR: rewrite: aggregate column of view must be at rigth side in qual
>>
>> select istat from comuni where istat in (
>> select istat from comuni group by istat having 1 < count(istat)
>> );
>> ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-11-30 02:20:36 | Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-30 02:13:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch |