From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Thom Brown" <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
Date: | 2010-08-29 16:28:06 |
Message-ID: | 18772.1283099286@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/dark_ixion/4937010683/sizes/o/
> For me, that's the easiest to read so far. With a lot of the other
> distractions cleaned up, I wonder if it's worth throwing another
> version up with subtle shadows on the boxes which have rounded
> corners. I think that glitzes things up enough to make it more
> pleasing visually, without really distracting me. Of course if its
> distracting enough for anyone to annoy or detract from usability
> then they don't belong -- I just wonder if they might have
> previously been seen as distracting largely because of they were
> next to all those eye-grabbing colors....
The yellow "note" boxes still strike me as too eye-grabbing for
their purpose. Otherwise this version seems nice.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-29 16:37:46 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-29 16:24:03 | Re: SGML on functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-29 16:37:46 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2010-08-29 16:20:55 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |