Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is a revised patch: all the regression tests patch, and I'm not
> aware of any major remaining issues. Barring any objections, I'll apply
> this tomorrow.
I object ... this is still trying to enforce tupdesc refcounting on much
more of the system than I think useful or prudent.
I'll try to come up with an alternative patch.
regards, tom lane