Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TupleDesc refcounting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TupleDesc refcounting
Date: 2006-01-22 18:43:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is a revised patch: all the regression tests patch, and I'm not
> aware of any major remaining issues. Barring any objections, I'll apply
> this tomorrow.

I object ... this is still trying to enforce tupdesc refcounting on much
more of the system than I think useful or prudent.

I'll try to come up with an alternative patch.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2006-01-22 18:50:25
Subject: Re: TupleDesc refcounting
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-22 18:26:23
Subject: Re: Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group