Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes: > Looking at this briefly. It looks like the check should be called from > enum_in() and enum_recv(). What error should be raised if the enum row's > xmin isn't committed? ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED? or maybe > ERRCODE_DATA_EXCEPTION? I don't see anything that fits very well.
ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE is something we use in some other places where the meaning is "just wait awhile, dude". Or you could invent a new ERRCODE.