Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> writes:
> On 07/12/2011 10:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What you need to look into is why the estimated join size is 9400 rows
>> when the actual join size is zero. Are both tables ANALYZEd? Are you
>> intentionally selecting rows that have no join partners?
> Yes, both tables have been ANALYZEd. What do you mean, intentilnaly
> selecting rows taht have no join partners?
I'm wondering why the actual join size is zero. That seems like a
rather unexpected case for a query like this.
regards, tom lane