Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior
Date: 2007-02-05 07:16:49
Message-ID: 18725.1170659809@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> As I already said - it works until I create a rule for the next
> partition (not used yet) - then is suddenly stops working.

Suddenly stops working, or continues doing exactly what it did before?
I'm wondering if you are relying on a cached plan that doesn't include
the new rule.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-02-05 07:43:48 Re: ERROR: missing cache data for cache id 27
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2007-02-05 07:01:31 Re: partitioning / rules - strange behavior