Re: Index problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Patrik Kudo <kudo(at)partitur(dot)se>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, girgen(at)partitur(dot)se
Subject: Re: Index problem
Date: 2000-11-16 03:54:38
Message-ID: 18695.974346878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> But it hasn't got done yet. (Peter, would it be
>> easy to make GUC handle this? There'd need to be some way to cause
>> guc.c to do a putenv() ...)

> I thought pg_control was the place for this. Any idea how long a locale
> string can legally be? Doesn't look too hard beyond that.

That would work too, I guess.

> Then again, perhaps this should be a per-database thing, much like the
> encoding. The postmaster doesn't do any collating, so it should be safe
> to have different locale in different backends. -- Unless someone puts an
> index on pg_database.datname. :-)

There already is an index on pg_group.groname, so I think we'd better be
conservative and require the same locale across the whole installation.

Hmm ... doesn't that mean that per-database encoding is a bogus concept
too!?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luis Farfn 2000-11-16 06:25:48
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-11-15 22:33:18 Re: Index problem