| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)zoho(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
| Date: | 2015-12-07 22:54:14 |
| Message-ID: | 18674.1449528854@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> We would definitely want something within the ephemeral port range, so
>> we are up to that:
>> rand() * 16384 + 49152;
> Yes, this seems to produce the correct range.
Speaking of ephemeral port range ... if get_new_node() were to run
past port 65535, which is certainly possible with this new code,
it would fail altogether. Seems it needs to wrap around properly
within that port range.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-07 23:07:59 | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-07 22:46:11 | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |