From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: planner fails on HEAD |
Date: | 2011-12-04 22:11:07 |
Message-ID: | 18665.1323036667@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2011/12/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> [ scratches head ... ] Given that it got past the previous assertions,
>> surely that ought to be impossible. Could we see the values of
>> cost_mergejoin's local variables, please?
> It is strange
> when I put a fprintf(stderr, "const literal") to exactly before or
> somewhere after assertion, then assertion is ok. Without fprintf
> assertion fails again
> it looks like gcc bug - gcc 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1) It was
> configured just with --enable-debug and --enable-cassert
Hmm. I'm betting that gcc has flushed one value to memory but the other
one is still in a register that's wider than memory, creating a roundoff
hazard. Can you look at the generated assembly code?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-12-04 22:52:41 | Re: planner fails on HEAD |
Previous Message | Martin Pihlak | 2011-12-04 22:10:03 | Re: logging in high performance systems. |