Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:45:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, that works out very nicely: there's now only one place besides
>> tupmacs.h that needs a new #include.
>> I did a little more polishing, and consider the attached committable,
>> unless anyone has objections.
> Nice. I have looked at the patch and it seems to me that no spots
> have been missed.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane