Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm dubious that it's worth the trouble. I suggest that it might be
>> best to replace these usages of L'\0' by plain scalar 0. Does anyone
>> think that wouldn't work or is too grotty?
> or maybe 0x0000, which I gather from
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_character> is the usual locution.
Hm. I don't really read that page as suggesting that 0x0000 is what to
use if your compiler hasn't got wide chars. I'd tend to go with just 0,
which is a reasonably common substitute for non-wide '\0' ...
regards, tom lane