| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening |
| Date: | 2010-03-01 16:43:06 |
| Message-ID: | 18562.1267461786@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> BTW, in case anyone with admin privileges is paying attention, the
>> buildfarm (a) is about two hours off on its system clock again,
>> and (b) hasn't sent out a daily status-change summary email since
>> Friday.
> Eh? The buildfarm sends out a daily status-change summary email? To where?
See
http://pgfoundry.org/mail/?group_id=1000040
I'm subscribed to pgbuildfarm-status-green ... and the archives for
it match my local log, which says there hasn't been a message since
Friday. That's definitely not for lack of changes. Now that I look
at the archives, it looks like all the status lists stopped getting
mail around that time.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-03-01 16:52:50 | Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-03-01 16:40:31 | Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-01 16:44:20 | Re: contrib/xml2 regression tests vs no-libxslt build option |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-03-01 16:40:31 | Re: Re: pgsql: add EPERM to the list of return codes to expect from opening |