Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 24.02.26 17:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> While we've done a lot of const-cleanliness work recently, this patch
>> should be enough to silence most of the cast-away-const warnings I'm
>> seeing in the BF back branches. Only "midge" is showing them at the
>> moment, but more people will be seeing them as gcc 16 gets more
>> widespread.

> These warnings came in from the new glibc version 2.43, not from the
> compiler.

Ah. Although I suppose you also need a sufficiently late-model
compiler, to understand the annotations on strchr() and friends.
Anyway, thanks for the correction.

regards, tom lane