Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Also, do we want these features? Do they duplicate anything we already
> have?
This patch only covers SQLSTATE/SQLERRM for plpgsql, which I think we're
now agreed on doing. The other stuff is still open for discussion ---
personally I'm OK with the concept of LEAST and GREATEST, not too
excited about the other things Pavel suggested. (Note I've not looked
at the proposed code for least/greatest yet, it may have issues.)
regards, tom lane