From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hari Krishna Sunder <hari(dot)db(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should TRUNCATE fire DDL triggers |
Date: | 2025-07-09 06:39:27 |
Message-ID: | 18466b927e99910b78d98c5cbe252f8eff66d72e.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2025-07-08 at 21:23 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 8, 2025, Hari Krishna Sunder <hari(dot)db(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > First of all, is TRUNCATE a DDL or a DML? This doc refers to it as a DDL,
> > whereas other docs like this and this treat it as a DML, so which one is it?
>
> Neither…classification systems are often imperfect…but it sure quacks like
> DML to my ears. I’d probably remove the term “DDL” from that first link and
> avoid the grey area. Listing the two commands suffices.
I agree with that.
> > A lot of other SQL databases treat TRUNCATE as a DDL, so assuming that is
> > true, can we add it to the command tags supported by "ddl_command_start"
> > and "ddl_command_end" triggers?
>
> Seems worthy of consideration regardless of how one answers the prior
> question; for much the same reason.
I disagree here. There are regular ON TRUNCATE triggers on tables, so I don't
see the need. You can define a trigger with the same trigger function on
several tables.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2025-07-09 06:40:00 | Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness - Preliminary feedback and outline for an extensible approach |
Previous Message | sundayjiang (蒋浩天) | 2025-07-09 06:38:51 | 回复:[Internet]Re: [PATCH] Prevent replacement of a function if it's used in an index expression and is not IMMUTABLE |