| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical to physical page mapping |
| Date: | 2012-10-27 13:43:05 |
| Message-ID: | 18433.1351345385@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> The reason why we need full_page_writes is that we need to guard against
> torn pages or partial writes. So what if smgr would manage a mapping
> between logical page numbers and their physical location in the relation?
> At the moment where we today require a full page write into WAL, we
> would mark the buffer as "needs relocation". The smgr would then write
> this page into another physical location whenever it is time to write it
> (via the background writer, hopefully). After that page is flushed, it
> would update the page location pointer, or whatever we want to call it.
> A thus free'd physical page location can be reused, once the location
> pointer has been flushed to disk. This is a critical ordering of writes.
> First the page at the new location, second the pointer to the current
> location. Doing so would make write(2) appear atomic to us, which is
> exactly what we need for crash recovery.
I think you're just moving the atomic-write problem from the data pages
to wherever you keep these pointers.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Erdman | 2012-10-27 15:30:11 | My first patch! (to \df output) |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-10-27 11:27:46 | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |