| From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The case of PostgreSQL on NFS Server (II) |
| Date: | 2015-04-03 00:32:48 |
| Message-ID: | 183FBB86-BA54-4ACA-9D1A-BBD94B7C8E20@blighty.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Apr 2, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Octavi Fors <octavi(at)live(dot)unc(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> And second, because I need the database to be accessible from two computers in the same LAN.
If you do this, you will destroy your database[1].
Why not have the database running on one machine, all the time, potentially with a real disk subsystem then just access it from wherever on the LAN you need to? Postgresql is a client-server database, and you can access it over the network as easily as you can from the machine it's running on.
Cheers,
Steve
[1] Almost certainly, unless you make absolutely sure postgresql is only started on one machine at a time, amongst other things.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-04-03 00:47:37 | Re: The case of PostgreSQL on NFS Server (II) |
| Previous Message | Dzmitry Nikitsin | 2015-04-03 00:24:26 | ERROR: out of memory |