Re: transaction safety

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: DaVinci <bombadil(at)wanadoo(dot)es>
Cc: Lista PostgreSql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transaction safety
Date: 2001-02-12 15:22:30
Message-ID: 18343.981991350@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

DaVinci <bombadil(at)wanadoo(dot)es> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:08:01PM -0000, Michael Ansley wrote:
>> Typically, the insert for a person, and for all the associated addresses
>> would be done in the same transaction so that if the insert for one of the
>> addresses failed, then the whole lot would role back (perhaps a bit extreme,
>> but I think that's what you asked for ;-)

> I thought it is possible to have different transactions opened and insert
> data in same table from them. It seems my idea was fault, doesn't it?.
> In sumary: locks with inserts are for table and not for tuple. If this is
> not true, tell me details, please :)

It's not true. How did you arrive at that conclusion from what Mike
said?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fred Yankowski 2001-02-12 15:23:05 Re: startup Postgres on NT
Previous Message Michael Ansley 2001-02-12 15:10:49 RE: transaction safety