Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-11-30 22:39:37
Message-ID: 1830.1133390377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 17:31 -0500, Robert Bernier wrote:
>> I'm for keeping them in some sort of archive for historical reasons. My feeling is that somewhere down the road this will be a big deal.

> We always have the CVS repo, so if we remove them... not big deal.

It's not necessarily that easy to rebuild old releases --- for instance,
modern versions of bison will spit up on our older grammar files, due to
carelessness about semicolons; and newer C compilers may complain about
things that older ones let pass, too.

Unless we're feeling short of disk space on the server, I'm for leaving
them there somewhere. But definitely mark them old and not-recommended.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-11-30 22:41:49 Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-11-30 22:39:16 Re: Strange interval arithmetic

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-11-30 22:41:49 Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2005-11-30 22:31:18 Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases