| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alan Li <ali(at)truviso(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
| Date: | 2009-06-22 15:14:24 |
| Message-ID: | 18196.1245683664@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> The more useful case for data load is "create or truncate it in the
>> same transaction", of course.
> Unfortunately, WAL bypass also requires not being in archive mode with
> no way to turn that off w/o a server restart, aiui.
Well, if you're trying to archive then you certainly wouldn't want WAL
off, so I'm failing to see where this thread is going ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-06-22 15:18:42 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-06-22 15:11:08 | Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? |