Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl validator function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl validator function
Date: 2005-06-22 16:48:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> That attached 2 patches implement a validator function for plperl, and 
> support for it in createlang.

Applied.  (BTW, a single patch file is generally easier to deal with.)

> This has somewhat less utility than do such functions for languages with 
> stricter compiletime as opposed to runtime requirements, but I still 
> think it's useful. If this is acceptable I'll provide a regression test 
> in due course - I don't think any documentation is required.

I don't really see the need for a separate regression test --- the thing
is implicitly exercised by each function you create, anyway.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-06-22 16:52:39
Subject: Re: Problem with dblink regression test
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-06-22 16:47:05
Subject: Re: Problem with dblink regression test

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group