Re: plperl validator function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl validator function
Date: 2005-06-22 16:48:05
Message-ID: 18183.1119458885@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> That attached 2 patches implement a validator function for plperl, and
> support for it in createlang.

Applied. (BTW, a single patch file is generally easier to deal with.)

> This has somewhat less utility than do such functions for languages with
> stricter compiletime as opposed to runtime requirements, but I still
> think it's useful. If this is acceptable I'll provide a regression test
> in due course - I don't think any documentation is required.

I don't really see the need for a separate regression test --- the thing
is implicitly exercised by each function you create, anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-22 16:52:39 Re: Problem with dblink regression test
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-06-22 16:47:05 Re: Problem with dblink regression test