Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CLOG contention

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CLOG contention
Date: 2012-01-05 20:20:19
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Parameterised slru buffer sizes were proposed about for 8.3 and opposed by you.
> I guess we all reserve the right to change our minds...

When presented with new data, sure.  Robert's results offer a reason to
worry about this, which we did not have before now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-05 20:23:09
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-01-05 20:10:45
Subject: Re: CLOG contention

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group