Re: CLOG contention

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CLOG contention
Date: 2012-01-05 20:20:19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Parameterised slru buffer sizes were proposed about for 8.3 and opposed by you.
> I guess we all reserve the right to change our minds...

When presented with new data, sure. Robert's results offer a reason to
worry about this, which we did not have before now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-05 20:23:09 Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-01-05 20:10:45 Re: CLOG contention