Re: utils C files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: utils C files
Date: 2002-07-18 01:37:14
Message-ID: 18124.1026956234@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> How is this any better than just mentioning the *.o file and letting the
> default rules compile it. I don't understand how linking to the current
> directory gets us anything. Now, if you did a 'make -C dir target' that
> would be different.

The whole point of the pushups for libpq is that we DON'T want the
default rules. We need to compile it PIC so that it can go into a
shared library. This will not be the same object file built in the
ports directory.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-18 01:40:25 Re: utils C files
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2002-07-18 01:25:39 Re: GiST Indexing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-18 01:40:25 Re: utils C files
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-07-18 00:32:21 Re: utils C files