Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-16 23:58:22
Message-ID: 18076.1276732702@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um ... wait a minute. What happened to backwards compatibility?
>> I thought the idea was to deprecate => for a release or so, not kill it
>> on the spot.

> hstore => text[] is new in 9.0.

Wup, sorry, I read this as being the other operator. Nevermind ...

(FWIW, I share your dislike of & for this operator. I just haven't
got a better idea.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-06-17 00:56:13 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-06-16 23:54:59 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>