| From: | Thomas Adam <thomas(dot)adam22(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired |
| Date: | 2009-03-26 00:47:48 |
| Message-ID: | 18071eea0903251747x650baa68hd7800958be301985@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
2009/3/25 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Some PostgreSQL mailing lists, including the one you are reading now, are
>> proposed to be retired, because they receive very little or mostly off-topic
>> traffic.
>
>> * pgsql-interfaces
>>
>> Many PostgreSQL interfaces have their own mailing lists. Posts that don't fit
>> anywhere else could go to pgsql-general.
>
> We consider that enough time for objections has passed with no
> objections being raised, so this list is going to be deleted Real Soon
> Now. You Have Been Warned.
I find it amusing that "low traffic" implies some level of
irrelevancy. What a load of tosh. This list has a purpose, it
*serves* that purpose, and does so well. By removing this and
consolidating it with another similarly-related one, you're just going
to contaminate that other list.
-- Thomas Adam
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-26 01:23:06 | Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired |
| Previous Message | Andrew McNamara | 2009-03-25 23:32:22 | Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired |