| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to user level |
| Date: | 2006-07-26 21:03:23 |
| Message-ID: | 18071.1153947803@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> The question though is if we did that, would Slony actually use it?
> If it made sence to do it, then yes we would do it. The problem ends up being
> Slony is designed to work across a multitude of versions of PG, and unless
> this was backported to at least 7.4, it would take a while (ie when we
> stopped supporting versions older than it was ported into) before we would
> make use of it.
[ shrug... ] That's not happening; for one thing the change requires a
layout change in pg_control and we have no mechanism to do that without
initdb.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sailesh Krishnamurthy | 2006-07-26 21:08:20 | Update on TelegraphCQ |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-26 21:02:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2006-07-26 21:16:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-26 21:02:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |