Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions
Date: 2023-01-03 18:14:05
Message-ID: 1805306.1672769645@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 10:57 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> While I approve of trying to get some functionality in this area,
>> I'm not sure that extending CAST is a great idea, because I'm afraid
>> that the SQL committee will do something that conflicts with it.

> I'm going off the spec that Vik presented in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f8600a3b-f697-2577-8fea-f40d3e18bea8@postgresfriends.org
> which is his effort to get it through the SQL committee.

I'm pretty certain that sending something to pgsql-hackers will have
exactly zero impact on the SQL committee. Is there anything actually
submitted to the committee, and if so what's its status?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-01-03 18:16:40 Re: Error-safe user functions
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-01-03 18:10:31 Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION