| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |
| Date: | 2006-01-16 21:04:58 |
| Message-ID: | 18049.1137445498@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ok... maybe notice? log? i suppose that the ERROR line is error level
> so the idea is lowering the context so i can put
> client_min_messages='error' and see just what the user can
> understand...
If you don't want to show the context field, build your own error
message from the other fields. libpq provides adequate support for
that. I'm not sure what the state of play is in JDBC or other APIs,
but if you need this you should be lobbying the client-side library
authors to change, not the backend.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2006-01-16 21:08:19 | Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-01-16 21:02:37 | Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benjamin Wragg | 2006-01-17 00:58:24 | ISBN-13 support |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-01-16 20:59:45 | Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint |