Re: Online verification of checksums

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Asif Rehman <asifr(dot)rehman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Date: 2021-09-13 11:45:08
Message-ID: 17C8D292-E12E-4FDF-AF1A-2BF08AB3AFC1@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 Sep 2021, at 13:18, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 9 Jul 2021, at 22:00, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I am changing the status to "Waiting on Author" based on the latest comments of @David Steele
>> and secondly the patch does not apply cleanly.
>
> This patch hasn’t moved since marked as WoA in the last CF and still doesn’t
> apply, unless there is a new version brewing it seems apt to close this as RwF
> and await a new entry in a future CF.

As there has been no movement, I've marked this patch as RwF.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2021-09-13 12:48:45 Is SPI + Procedures (with COMMIT) inside a bgworker broken?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-09-13 11:43:24 Re: brin multi minmax crash for inet value