Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-04-06 23:27:13
Message-ID: 17C2635B-C12F-4479-BC70-3A6BB43C9FBA@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 07 Apr 2018, at 01:13, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2018-04-07 01:04:50 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> I'm fairly certain that the bug here is a simple race condition in the
>>> test (not the main code!):
>>
>> I wonder if it may perhaps be a case of both?
>
> See my other message about the atomic fallback bit.

Yep, my MUA pulled it down just as I had sent this. Thanks for confirming my
suspicion.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-04-06 23:31:56 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-04-06 23:25:20 Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions