Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch -- I applied a modified version (we can't use
>> <ulink url="...">description</ulink> since that won't work for
>> printed versions of the docs).
> Sure it will. We use that all over the place.
Not since Bruce took them all out a few days ago ;-). If you were
unhappy with that you should have spoken up. I thought the problem
was that the default printed representation doesn't show the URL
and is thus pretty useless.
regards, tom lane