Re: strange failure in plpgsql_control tests (on fulmar, ICC 14.0.3)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: strange failure in plpgsql_control tests (on fulmar, ICC 14.0.3)
Date: 2018-03-17 19:41:15
Message-ID: 17998.1521315675@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On March 17, 2018 12:25:57 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If we're not putting a test into the back branches, then we darn well
>> better be using the same code there as in HEAD, else we won't know that
>> it actually solves the problem.

> I was thinking of committing your version everywhere and then revising in master after a bf cycle.

Meh. I don't really feel a need to change it at all, but if we do,
I think it should be "after a release cycle" not just a few days.
We need to see whether that regression test will expose any problems
on a wider variety of compilers than exist in the buildfarm.

Anyway, pushed for now --- Tomas, if you blocked fulmar, it should
be safe to unblock.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message john frazer 2018-03-17 19:54:04 Fwd: Problems with Error Messages wrt Domains, Checks
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-17 19:32:33 Re: strange failure in plpgsql_control tests (on fulmar, ICC 14.0.3)