Re: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement
Date: 2014-07-10 01:30:05
Message-ID: 17980.1404955805@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I guess that this implementation is enough as a first shot, particularly
> regarding the complexity that default expression import would bring up for
> postgres_fdw (point raised during the review, but not really discussed
> afterwards).

Yeah. I'm actually more concerned about the lack of collation import,
but that's unfixable unless we can figure out how to identify collations
in a platform-independent way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-07-10 03:16:55 Re: better atomics - v0.5
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-07-10 01:28:08 Re: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement