| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Liudmila Mantrova <l(dot)mantrova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL/JSON: documentation |
| Date: | 2018-09-28 20:43:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1797.1538167390@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 09/28/2018 01:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> - I don't think this should be moved to a separate file. Yes, func.sgml
>> is pretty big, but if we're going to split it up, we should do it in a
>> systematic way, not just one section.
> I'm in favor of doing that. It's rather a monster.
> I agree it should not be done piecemeal.
Maybe split it into one file per existing section?
Although TBH, I am not convinced that the benefits of doing that
will exceed the back-patching pain we'll incur.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-28 20:45:49 | Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-09-28 20:40:42 | Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API |