Re: UNDO with FILEOPS, and the FLUX table AM

From: Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNDO with FILEOPS, and the FLUX table AM
Date: 2026-10-16 00:26:07
Message-ID: 179211036758.65251.17711026340649348592@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Greg,

> v6, attached, fixes both of them, along with the cfbot failures
> from v4.

Thanks, the fixes you describe are what I hoped for, and I was about to
measure them. But I think the wrong tarball went out: undo-v6.tar.gz is v3
with a new version number. Diffing each v6-00NN against v3-00NN, the only
line that differs in all 20 files is the "[PATCH v6 NN/20]" in the Subject;
the commit ids in the "From <sha>" lines are v3's (0001 is b7667c1ca7bf).
There is no cover letter, no test_fileops/t/017, slog_num_partitions is still
in 0005, and 0004 still adds 073-075 etc. It also lacks v4's record
alignment fix, so cfbot will be testing v3 again.

Could you resend the real v6? I'll run 017 on the three paths, the chmod
repro against v4 on the same machine, and the per-prefix check as soon as it
is out.

Regards,
Manu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zengxx 2026-10-16 00:37:10 Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve ndistinct estimates for flattened UNION ALL
Previous Message Baji Shaik 2026-10-16 00:22:15 Re: [PATCH] Doc fix for autovacuum_max_parallel_workers