Re: doc: Document Linux cgroup memory limits

From: Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joao Detomini <joao(dot)detomini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc: Document Linux cgroup memory limits
Date: 2026-10-05 15:01:05
Message-ID: 179121246501.26583.17239263351899412662@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi João,

> Attached v5 softens that sentence and recommends leaving a safety
> margin below the limit, the same way the work_mem docs put it.

v5 reads correctly -- the total can indeed be many times work_mem, and
the safety-margin wording matches how work_mem is documented. Only the
last paragraph changed and the docs still build, so this stays Ready for
Committer from my side.

Regards,
Manu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trakshan Mishra 2026-10-05 15:03:22 Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] Fix segmentation fault caused by reentrancy in RI_Fkey_cascade_del (ri_triggers.c)
Previous Message shihao zhong 2026-10-05 14:56:41 Re: pg_resetwal: refuse to run when backup_label exists