Re: Missing include <openssl/x509.h> in be-secure-openssl.c?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, buildfarm(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: Missing include <openssl/x509.h> in be-secure-openssl.c?
Date: 2021-11-03 14:35:36
Message-ID: 1790342.1635950136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> I would follow the practice of upstream to include both if were me
> to be consistent, but I'm also fine if you just add x509v3.h to
> be-secure-openssl.c.

24f9e49e4 has not fixed it, so I have no idea what to do next.
We definitely need some input from the machine's owner:

* what OpenSSL version is that?
* is HEAD being built any differently from v14 (seems like it must be)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2021-11-03 14:39:20 Re: Should we support new definition for Identity column : GENERATED BY DEFAULT ON NULL?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-11-03 14:13:55 Re: removing global variable ThisTimeLineID