Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 12:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> To preserve platform and version independence of the dump.
> Only if there is a risk. Since a common route to upgrade is a
> dump/restore back onto same box it seems worth having an option to do
> this.
I think you missed the point about version independence. That would be
exactly the scenario where a version-to-version change in binary format
--- for instance, "money" widening to 64 bits in 8.3 --- would burn you.
Furthermore, this doesn't seem like a scenario where performance ought
to be the primary concern. How often do you do major version upgrades?
regards, tom lane