Re: Re: [PATCHES] Select parser at runtime

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Select parser at runtime
Date: 2001-08-12 02:47:14
Message-ID: 17793.997584434@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Oracle uses a weird syntax for outer joins.

> We had already rejected this idea. The earlier this disappears from the
> face of the earth the better.

Now now, what about our goal of Postgres world domination? Gonna be
tough to get there unless we can assimilate Oracle users ;-)

I do want to keep that brain-damaged syntax at arm's length, which
suggests a separate parser rather than merging it into our main
parser. I'm not convinced a translation can be done at the grammar
level with no semantic analysis --- but if Ian thinks he can do it,
let him try...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-12 04:25:28 Re: Re: [PATCHES] Select parser at runtime
Previous Message Darren Johnson 2001-08-12 02:32:59 Re: Comparing tables in different db's

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-12 03:02:37 Re: Re: copy to/from stdout using libpgtcl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-12 02:06:57 Re: Re: copy to/from stdout using libpgtcl